Background: Multi-Agent Framework Comparison
Multi-agent systems are becoming the standard architecture for complex AI applications. This article compares the features and use cases of mainstream frameworks.
1. Framework Overview
| Framework | Origin | Positioning | Open Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shannon | Kocoro Labs | Production-grade orchestration | Yes |
| AutoGen | Microsoft | Conversational multi-agent | Yes |
| CrewAI | Community | Role-playing collaboration | Yes |
| LangGraph | LangChain | Graph-structured workflows | Yes |
| MetaGPT | DeepWisdom | Software development | Yes |
2. Framework Details
2.1 Shannon
Positioning: Production-grade multi-agent orchestration platform
Core Features:
- Go + Rust + Python multi-language architecture
- Temporal workflow engine (deterministic replay)
- Built-in budget control and cost tracking
- WASI sandbox execution
- OPA policy engine
Architecture:
Orchestrator (Go) → Task routing, budget control
Agent Core (Rust) → Sandbox execution
LLM Service (Python) → Model calls, tool execution
Temporal → Workflow orchestration
Use Cases:
- Production environment deployment
- Cost control requirements
- Deterministic debugging needs
- Security isolation requirements
Example:
curl -X POST http://localhost:8080/api/v1/tasks \
-d '{"query": "Analyze market data", "session_id": "quant-1"}'
2.2 AutoGen
Positioning: Microsoft's open-source conversational multi-agent framework
Core Features:
- Conversation-based Agent interaction
- Human-in-the-loop support
- Code execution capabilities
- Flexible Agent definitions
Architecture:
UserProxyAgent → Represents user, can execute code
AssistantAgent → LLM-powered assistant
GroupChat → Multi-Agent conversation management
Use Cases:
- Research and prototyping
- Code generation tasks
- Human-AI collaboration needs
- Conversational workflows
Example:
from autogen import AssistantAgent, UserProxyAgent
assistant = AssistantAgent("assistant", llm_config=llm_config)
user_proxy = UserProxyAgent("user_proxy", code_execution_config={"work_dir": "coding"})
user_proxy.initiate_chat(assistant, message="Analyze this dataset")
2.3 CrewAI
Positioning: Role-playing multi-agent collaboration framework
Core Features:
- Clear role definitions (Role, Goal, Backstory)
- Task-driven
- Tool integration
- Simple and easy to use
Architecture:
Agent → Define roles and capabilities
Task → Define specific tasks
Crew → Organize Agent collaboration
Tool → Available tools for Agents
Use Cases:
- Rapid prototyping
- Tasks with clear roles
- Content generation
- Research assistants
Example:
from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew
researcher = Agent(
role='Market Researcher',
goal='Analyze market trends',
backstory='You are a senior quantitative analyst'
)
task = Task(
description='Analyze BTC trends over the past week',
agent=researcher
)
crew = Crew(agents=[researcher], tasks=[task])
result = crew.kickoff()
2.4 LangGraph
Positioning: Graph-structured Agent workflow framework
Core Features:
- State machine + graph structure
- Loop and branch support
- LangChain ecosystem integration
- Workflow visualization
Architecture:
StateGraph → Define states and transitions
Node → Processing nodes (functions or Agents)
Edge → State transition logic
Checkpointer → State persistence
Use Cases:
- Complex workflows
- Loop logic requirements
- State management needs
- LangChain users
Example:
from langgraph.graph import StateGraph
workflow = StateGraph(AgentState)
workflow.add_node("analyze", analyze_market)
workflow.add_node("decide", make_decision)
workflow.add_edge("analyze", "decide")
app = workflow.compile()
result = app.invoke({"input": "Analyze market"})
2.5 MetaGPT
Positioning: Multi-agent system for software development
Core Features:
- Simulates software teams
- Roles: PM, Architect, Engineer, QA
- Document-driven development
- Code generation
Architecture:
ProductManager → Requirements analysis
Architect → System design
Engineer → Code implementation
QA → Testing and validation
Use Cases:
- Software development tasks
- Code generation
- Technical documentation generation
3. Comparison Matrix
| Feature | Shannon | AutoGen | CrewAI | LangGraph | MetaGPT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Production Ready | 5/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| Ease of Use | 3/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Cost Control | 5/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| Debugging | 5/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 | 4/5 | 2/5 |
| Security Isolation | 5/5 | 2/5 | 1/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| Community Activity | 3/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| Quant Suitability | 4/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 1/5 |
4. Quant Trading Scenario Fit
4.1 Scenario: Market Analysis Multi-Agent
| Framework | Implementation Difficulty | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Shannon | Medium | 5/5 |
| AutoGen | Low | 4/5 |
| CrewAI | Low | 3/5 |
| LangGraph | Medium | 4/5 |
4.2 Scenario: Real-Time Trade Execution
| Framework | Implementation Difficulty | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Shannon | Medium | 5/5 |
| AutoGen | High | 2/5 |
| CrewAI | High | 1/5 |
| LangGraph | Medium | 3/5 |
Reasons:
- Shannon has production-grade orchestration and security sandbox
- AutoGen/CrewAI lack execution control
- Real-time trading requires low latency and high reliability
4.3 Scenario: Strategy Research Prototyping
| Framework | Implementation Difficulty | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Shannon | Medium | 3/5 |
| AutoGen | Low | 5/5 |
| CrewAI | Low | 4/5 |
| LangGraph | Medium | 4/5 |
Reason: Research phase needs rapid iteration, ease of use matters more
5. Architecture Selection Decision Tree
What is your main requirement?
│
├─ Production Deployment
│ ├─ Need cost control → Shannon
│ ├─ Need deterministic replay → Shannon
│ └─ Need security sandbox → Shannon
│
├─ Rapid Prototyping
│ ├─ Conversational interaction → AutoGen
│ ├─ Role-playing tasks → CrewAI
│ └─ Complex workflows → LangGraph
│
├─ Code Generation Tasks
│ ├─ Need human-AI collaboration → AutoGen
│ └─ Simulate dev team → MetaGPT
│
└─ Quant Trading
├─ Research phase → AutoGen / CrewAI
└─ Live trading → Shannon
6. Integration Examples
6.1 Shannon + Quant Strategy
from shannon import ShannonClient
client = ShannonClient(base_url="http://localhost:8080")
# Submit analysis task
handle = client.submit_task(
query="Analyze BTC/USDT market state, determine if trending or ranging",
session_id="regime-detection"
)
# Wait for result
result = client.wait(handle.task_id)
6.2 AutoGen + Quant Research
from autogen import AssistantAgent, UserProxyAgent
quant_analyst = AssistantAgent(
"quant_analyst",
system_message="You are a quantitative analyst skilled in market data analysis and strategy design",
llm_config=llm_config
)
user = UserProxyAgent(
"user",
code_execution_config={"work_dir": "research"}
)
user.initiate_chat(
quant_analyst,
message="Design an RSI-based mean reversion strategy"
)
6.3 CrewAI + Research Team
from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew
analyst = Agent(
role='Quant Analyst',
goal='Analyze market data',
tools=[market_data_tool]
)
developer = Agent(
role='Strategy Developer',
goal='Convert analysis into code',
tools=[code_execution_tool]
)
reviewer = Agent(
role='Risk Control Reviewer',
goal='Check strategy risks',
tools=[risk_analysis_tool]
)
crew = Crew(
agents=[analyst, developer, reviewer],
tasks=[...],
process="sequential"
)
7. Future Trends
- Standardization: Agent communication protocol standards
- Specialization: Domain-specific vertical frameworks
- Production-Ready: More frameworks supporting production deployment
- Integration: Multi-framework integration becomes common
- Low-Code: Visual Agent orchestration tools
8. Selection Recommendations
| Scenario | Recommended Framework | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Live quant trading | Shannon | Production-grade, cost control, security |
| Quant strategy research | AutoGen | Easy to use, code execution |
| Rapid prototyping | CrewAI | Simplest, clear roles |
| Complex workflows | LangGraph | Graph structure, state management |
| Code generation | AutoGen / MetaGPT | Specifically optimized |
Core Principle: There's no perfect framework, only the right choice for your scenario. Use simple frameworks for rapid validation in research, use robust frameworks for reliable operation in production.